Reviwers Guidelines
Thank you for your interest in serving as a reviewer for the Journal Of Research in Economics and Social Science (JRES). Contribution You as reviewer very valuable for the review process peer And ensure quality And integrity published research . Guidelines following given For help You in do review comprehensive peer review And constructive :
- Skill And Qualifications . Reviewer must own skill And experience in main relevant discussion with the script in progress reviewed . This can covers qualification academic , experience research , and skill professional in the field education .
- Confidentiality . Reviewer must guard confidentiality of the review process peer And withhold self For No disclose information anything about script or the review to party third without permission previously from office editorial journal .
- Accuracy time . Reviewer requested For quick respond invitation review And send review they in term agreed time . Feed the right way back time very important For ensure processing efficient script And publication findings proper research time .
- Objectivity And Constructivity . Review must done in a way objective And give bait constructive feedback to Author . Reviewer must evaluate strength And weakness script , providing suggestions for repairs , and give comment special For support recommendation they .
- Consideration Ethical . Reviewer must evaluate script based on benefit scientific , originality , clarity , and its relevance with JRES coverage . Reviewers should also identify problem ethics , such as plagiarism , publication double , or violation research , and report it to office editorial journal .
- Conflict Interests . Reviewer must disclose potential conflict interests that can influence ability they For give review that is not take sides . Conflict interest can covers connection personal or professional with author , interests competing research , or Affiliation finance with the organization mentioned in script .
- Bait Come back For Author . Reviewer must give bait clear return And constructive to writer For help they increase script they . Bait come back must served in a way professional And full respect , with focus on content scientific And benefit scientific from work the .
- Compliance to Guidelines . Reviewer must get used to self with guidelines review journal And follow the format and specified criteria For evaluate script . Deviation anything from guidelines review must communicated to office editorial journal .
Thank you for your commitment to maintaining the quality and integrity of scholarly publishing. Your contributions as a reviewer are greatly appreciated and contribute to the advancement of education research and practice.
