Values Education in Curriculum Reform: A Qualitative Document Analysis of the Türkiye Century Maarif Model for Primary Education

Authors

Keywords:

values education, curriculum reform, document analysis, Türkiye Century Maarif Model, primary education

Abstract

Values education has become a central concern in contemporary curriculum reforms as education systems seek to balance academic achievement with character and moral development. This study examines how values education is conceptualized and operationalized within the Türkiye Century Maarif Model (TYMM), a newly introduced national curriculum framework in Türkiye. Using a qualitative document analysis, this research examines official curriculum policy documents published by the Ministry of National Education, focusing on primary education. Data were examined through thematic analysis to identify the structure, scope, and pedagogical orientation of values education embedded in the curriculum. The findings reveal that TYMM positions values not merely as implicit moral principles but as structured learning outcomes integrated into competencies, learning processes, and assessment expectations. The model emphasizes a holistic framework linking virtues, values, and actions, thereby signaling a shift toward more systematic and measurable character education. This study contributes to the literature on curriculum reform and values education by providing an empirically grounded analysis of a national curriculum model. It offers implications for curriculum designers, policymakers, and educators seeking to strengthen values-based education in primary schooling.

References

Alvero, John Cliford. “Empowering Future Global Citizens: An Integrated GCED Framework for Enhancing Cognitive, Socio-Emotional, and Behavioral Domains in Philippine Higher Education.” Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives 3, no. 9 (2025): 383–90. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.564.

Aybek, Birsel, and Osman Oğuz. “Sustainable and Inclusive Education Reform in Türkiye: A Cipp Evaluation of the Primary Turkish Language Curriculum.” Sustainability 17, no. 19 (September 26, 2025): 8659. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198659.

Bosio, Emiliano, and Hans Schattle. “Ethical Global Citizenship Education: From Neoliberalism to a Values-Based Pedagogy.” PROSPECTS 53, no. 3–4 (November 24, 2023): 287–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09571-9.

Bowen, Glenn A. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9, no. 2 (August 3, 2009): 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027.

Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. “One Size Fits All? What Counts as Quality Practice in (Reflexive) Thematic Analysis?” Qualitative Research in Psychology 18, no. 3 (July 3, 2021): 328–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.

Brown, Mitch, Robert E. McGrath, Melinda C. Bier, Keith Johnson, and Marvin W. Berkowitz. “A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Character Education Programs.” Journal of Moral Education 52, no. 2 (April 3, 2023): 119–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2022.2060196.

Can, Dila. “New Education Program in Values Education: Türkiye Century Maarif Model.” In PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning Current Archives About, 281–87. Global Research & Development Services Publishing, 2025. https://doi.org/10.20319/ictel.2025.281287.

Cheung, Kason Ka Ching, and Kevin W. H. Tai. “The Use of Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Interview Data Analysis in Science Education.” Research in Science & Technological Education 41, no. 3 (July 3, 2023): 1155–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1993179.

Chung, Ming-Lun, and Ken Ka-Wo Fung. “A New Paradigm of Moral Education and Civic Engagement? A Sociological Institutionalist Interpretation of Multiculturalism among Taiwanese Youth.” Journal of Moral Education 53, no. 4 (October 12, 2024): 717–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2024.2354964.

Dalglish, Sarah L, Hina Khalid, and Shannon A McMahon. “Document Analysis in Health Policy Research: The READ Approach.” Health Policy and Planning 35, no. 10 (February 16, 2021): 1424–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa064.

Eisman, Andria B., Lawrence A. Palinkas, Suzanne Brown, Leslie Lundahl, and Amy M. Kilbourne. “A Mixed Methods Investigation of Implementation Determinants for a School-Based Universal Prevention Intervention.” Implementation Research and Practice 3 (January 23, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895221124962.

English, Narelle, Pam Robertson, Shelley Gillis, and Lorraine Graham. “Rubrics and Formative Assessment in K-12 Education: A Scoping Review of Literature.” International Journal of Educational Research 113 (2022): 101964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101964.

Jacobson, Dan. “Naturalistic Inquiry.” In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 75:267–72. London: Elsevier, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10579-7.

Janssens, Oona, Mieke Embo, Martin Valcke, and Leen Haerens. “When Theory Beats Practice: The Implementation of Competency-Based Education at Healthcare Workplaces.” BMC Medical Education 23, no. 1 (June 29, 2023): 484. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04446-3.

Kaldaras, Leonora, Hope O. Akaeze, and Mark D. Reckase. “Developing Valid Assessments in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence.” Frontiers in Education 9 (August 7, 2024). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1399377.

Lee, Juyeon, and Alvin Junus. “Differences and Similarities in Youth Social-Emotional Competence Measurement Between North American and East Asian Countries: Exploratory Graph Analysis Using the OECD Survey on Social and Emotional Skills Data.” Child Indicators Research 17, no. 1 (February 23, 2024): 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-023-10074-6.

Lincoln, Yvonna S., Egon G. Guba, and Joseph J. Pilotta. “Naturalistic Inquiry.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 9, no. 4 (January 1985): 438–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8.

Marcotte, Kayla M., and Larry D. Gruppen. “Competency-Based Education as Curriculum and Assessment for Integrative Learning.” Education Sciences 12, no. 4 (April 11, 2022): 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040267.

Martinez-Yarza, Nerea, Rosa Santibáñez, and Josu Solabarrieta. “A Systematic Review of Instruments Measuring Social and Emotional Skills in School-Aged Children and Adolescents.” Child Indicators Research 16, no. 4 (August 19, 2023): 1475–1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-023-10031-3.

O’Connor, Cliodhna, and Helene Joffe. “Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19 (January 1, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220.

OECD. Embedding Values and Attitudes in Curriculum. OECD Publishing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1787/aee2adcd-en.

OECD. Innovating Assessments to Measure and Support Complex Skills. OECD Publishing, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1787/e5f3e341-en.

Pancorbo, Gina, Ricardo Primi, Oliver P. John, Daniel Santos, and Filip De Fruyt. “Decomposing Social-Emotional Skill Rubrics: A Methodological Approach to Examining Acquiescence in Rubrics’ Ratings.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 30, no. 5–6 (November 2, 2023): 429–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2023.2271679.

Pancorbo, Gina, Ricardo Primi, Oliver P. John, Daniel Santos, and Filip De Fruyt. “Formative Assessment of Social-Emotional Skills Using Rubrics: A Review of Knowns and Unknowns.” Frontiers in Education 6 (November 17, 2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.687661.

Pastore, Serafina. “Teacher Assessment Literacy: A Systematic Review.” Frontiers in Education 8 (July 6, 2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1217167.

Schultes, Marie-Therese. “An Introduction to Implementation Evaluation of School-Based Interventions.” European Journal of Developmental Psychology 20, no. 1 (January 2, 2023): 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2021.1976633.

Smith, Justin D., Dennis H. Li, and Miriam R. Rafferty. “The Implementation Research Logic Model: A Method for Planning, Executing, Reporting, and Synthesizing Implementation Projects.” Implementation Science 15, no. 1 (December 25, 2020): 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01041-8.

Soler-Anguiano, Francisco Leonardo, Sofía Rivera-Aragón, and Rolando Díaz-Loving. “Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance Evidence of Individualism and Collectivism: From the Idiosyncratic to Universal.” Frontiers in Psychology 14 (September 27, 2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1150757.

Swiecki, Zachari, Hassan Khosravi, Guanliang Chen, Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Jason M. Lodge, Sandra Milligan, Neil Selwyn, and Dragan Gašević. “Assessment in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 3 (2022): 100075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100075.

Vlachopoulos, Dimitrios, and Agoritsa Makri. “A Systematic Literature Review on Authentic Assessment in Higher Education: Best Practices for the Development of 21st Century Skills, and Policy Considerations.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 83 (December 2024): 101425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101425.

Welsandt, Nina Charlotte Johanna, Fabio Fortunati, Esther Winther, and Hermann Josef Abs. “Constructing and Validating Authentic Assessments: The Case of a New Technology-Based Assessment of Economic Literacy.” Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training 16, no. 1 (April 10, 2024): 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-024-00158-0.

Yoo, Dong-Mi, and Jae Jin Han. “Inter-Rater Reliability and Content Validity of the Measurement Tool for Portfolio Assessments Used in the Introduction to Clinical Medicine Course at Ewha Womans University College of Medicine: A Methodological Study.” Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions 21 (December 10, 2024): 39. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.39.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-01-29

How to Cite

Gürhan, Ethem. 2026. “Values Education in Curriculum Reform: A Qualitative Document Analysis of the Türkiye Century Maarif Model for Primary Education”. Journal of Educational Research and Practice 4 (1). Tulungagung, Indonesia:24-40. https://doi.org/10.70376/jerp.v4i1.413.